Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The cultural work of office charisma: maintaining professional power in psychotherapy.Mariana Craciun - 2016 - Theory and Society 45 (4):361-383.
    This article examines the cultural practices through which a group of professionals infuse their work and community with charisma. Although previous research has theorized the “charisma of office” (Weber 1978), we know little about how the occupants of such offices sustain it. I focus on a group of psychoanalytically-inclined psychotherapists, whose field, despite its early charismatic beginnings, has been especially embattled in recent decades. Drawing on ethnographic and interview data, I reveal how they share stories emphasizing their “idealization” by others, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Max Weber’s charismatic prophets.Christopher Adair-Toteff - 2014 - History of the Human Sciences 27 (1):3-20.
    Most accounts of Weber’s notion of charisma follow his own explicit comments and seek its origins in the writings of Rudolf Sohm. While I acknowledge the validity of this, I follow Weber’s suggestions and locate the charismatic forces in the political and ethical conduct and beliefs of certain Old Testament prophets, specifically Amos, Jeremiah and Isaiah. Their emphasis on political justice and ethical fairness, coupled with their unwavering belief in the power of prophecy, infuse Weber’s conception of charisma and in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Insights from the infamous: Recovering the social-theoretical first phase of populism studies.Paul K. Jones - 2019 - European Journal of Social Theory 22 (4):458-476.
    While early studies of populism, usually dated from the 1960s, were highly interdisciplinary, contemporary research in this field is dominated by political science and political theory. This current phase of research is narrowly focused on certain forms of political action and remarkably reluctant to pathologize the US case. Social theory plays at most a marginal role. Recent historicizations of this field have failed to recognize the significance of the prior ‘missing first phase’ of populism studies (1940–65) led by key sociological (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations