Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Ethics of the Meat Paradox

Environmental Ethics 38 (2):131-144 (2016)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What Would the Virtuous Person Eat? The Case for Virtuous Omnivorism.Christopher A. Bobier - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (3):1-19.
    Would the virtuous person eat animals? According to some ethicists, the answer is a resounding no, at least for the virtuous person living in an affluent society. The virtuous person cares about animal suffering, and so, she will not contribute to practices that involve animal suffering when she can easily adopt a strict plant-based diet. The virtuous person is temperate, and temperance involves not indulging in unhealthy diets, which include diets that incorporate animals. Moreover, it is unjust for an animal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Five Shapes of Cognitive Dissonance – Using Objective Hermeneutics to Understand the Meat Paradox.Helene Renaux & Stefan Mann - 2021 - Food Ethics 7 (1):1-14.
    Objective Hermeneutics is a qualitative method that focuses on few sequences of texts, which helps understand single cases. It is used to explore how consumers cope with the contradiction between their enjoyment for meat and their empathy for animals without using frameworks drafted by social scientists. Five cases are analysed, which range from strong references towards the societal norm of meat eating to a feeling of uncertainty in the face of the animals’ death. None of the cases, however, sees the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark