Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Grammatical conformity in question-answer sequences: The case of meiyou in Mandarin conversation.Wei Wang - 2020 - Discourse Studies 22 (5):610-631.
    This article probes into grammatical conformity in Mandarin by examining meiyou, a multifunctional negative form, in question-answer sequences. Using a conversation analysis approach, it discovers that, as a conforming answer to polar questions, meiyou acquiesces to all the terms and constraints of the question and maximizes the progressivity of the sequence. As a non-conforming response to polar questions, it mitigates the disagreement by avoiding a pointed syntactic negation. Meiyou can also respond to Q-word questions, problematizing the inference incorporated in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Expressing an alternative view from second position: Reversed polarity questions in everyday Japanese conversation.Hideyuki Sugiura - 2017 - Discourse Studies 19 (3):291-313.
    This conversation-analytic study examines a type of action accomplished through a reversed polarity question responding to initial assessments in everyday Japanese conversation. This study demonstrates that RPQs deployed in this specific position express alternative views to initial assessments by appealing to participants’ common sense or knowledge and index participants’ epistemic symmetry over a particular assessable. These RPQs do not simply convey the speakers’ disagreement with initial assessments, however, but are designed to be situated as ‘new’ first assessments by triggering the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations.Galina B. Bolden & Jeffrey D. Robinson - 2010 - Discourse Studies 12 (4):501-533.
    This article extends prior conversation analytic research on the preference organization of sequence-initiating actions. Across two languages, this article examines one such action: explicitly soliciting an account for human conduct. Prior work demonstrates that this action conveys a challenging stance towards the warrantability of the accountable event/conduct. When addressees are somehow responsible for the accountable event/conduct, explicit solicitations of accounts are frequently critical of, and thus embody disaffiliation with, addressees. This article demonstrates that, when explicit solicitations of accounts embody disaffiliation, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations