Switch to: References

Citations of:

Theory and history

New Haven,: Yale University Press (1957)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hermeneutics: A protreptic.Gregory R. Johnson - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):173-211.
    An argument is made for the relevance of phenomenological hermeneutics to economics, with special attention to recent debates on hermeneutics among economists of the Austrian school of Ludwig von Mises and F. A. Hayek. Hermeneutics is explicated in the context of Husserlian phenomenology, with special attention to phenomenology's Aristotelian roots. Naive and methodological forms of ?objectivism?; are contrasted with hermeneutics, which recovers the horizons of scientific knowledge: the whole, and the activities of the human knower. Finally, the charges that hermeneutics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Moral Underpinnings of Popper's Philosophy.Noretta Koertge - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 323--338.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Alfred Schütz - Od Husserla k Rakouské ekonomii.Petr Špecián - 2011 - E-Logos 18 (1):1-24.
    Článek rekapituluje ideová východiska Alfreda Schütze, který se na půdě metodologie společenských věd snaží o syntézu příspěvků Edmunda Husserla a Maxe Webera. Přestože v raném období Schütz blízce následuje Husserlův fenomenologický přístup, projevuje se již zde v první řadě důraz na empirický charakter zkoumání, který navazuje na weberovskou linii argumentace a staví se i proti názorům dalšího ze Schützových velkých učitelů, Ludwiga von Misese. Článek postupně analyzuje klíčové znaky Schützovy vlastní metody a ukazuje klíčové postavení, které hraje při našem vědeckém (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Review Essay: The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Hummel - 2006 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 20 (2):65-86.
    How congenial with libertarianism is Thomas E. Woods, Jr.'s, best selling but controversial Politically Incorrect Guide to American History? In fact, only about half the time. Some sections are quite good, from both a scholarly and ideological vantage. But the book's conservative reverence for the Constitution, for the Old South, and for tradition in general too often triumphs over a libertarian respect for individual rights. Many of the negative reviewers dislike The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History for being too (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Popper's Analysis of the Problems of Induction and Demarcation and Mises' Justification of the Theoretical Social Sciences.Natsuka Tokumaru - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. London: Springer. pp. 161--174.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (2 other versions)The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.Jeffrey Rogers Hummel - 2006 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 20:65-86.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Realism and abstraction in economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman.Roderick Long - manuscript
    Associate Professor | Director and President Department of Philosophy | Molinari Institute 6080 Haley Center, Auburn University Auburn AL 36849 USA email: [email protected] URL: praxeology.net..
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Understanding the rationality principle in economics as a functional a priori principle.Catherine Https://Orcidorg Herfeld - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 14):3329-3358.
    Since the early days of economics, the rationality principle has been a core element of economic theorizing. It is part of almost any theoretical framework that economists use to generate knowledge. Despite its central role, the principle’s epistemic status and function continue to be debated between empiricists and rationalists, and a clear winner is yet to emerge. One point of contention is that we cannot explain the principle’s special status in light of clear evidence against its empirical validity and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation