Switch to: References

Citations of:

A Relentless Spinozism: Deleuze's Encounter with Beckett

Audrey Wasser

Substance 41 (1):124-136 (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

How Do We Recognise Problems?Audrey Wasser - 2017 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 11 (1):48-67.details This article approaches Gilles Deleuze's notion of problems through a series of thinkers Deleuze draws on in developing this notion: Heidegger, Plato, Kant, Bergson and Nietzsche. Taking these thinkers as its guide, it sketches six broad characteristics that accompany an investment in problems, ultimately arguing that problems are attained through the activity of critique. It echoes Deleuze's essay ‘How Do We Recognise Structuralism?’ by asking: for whom do problems exist? What does Deleuze recognise in those who recognise problems? And what (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 8 citations
Deleuze and Beckett: An Immanent Encounter.Magdalena Wisniowska - 2014 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 8 (2):173-198.details Understanding the exact nature of Deleuze's debt to Kant forms a large part of contemporary Deleuzian scholarship, a project made all the more urgent since the publication of Meillassoux's critique of correlationism in 2007. These Kantian readings present Deleuze as someone who continues Kant's transcendental project by reconsidering the nature of ‘immanent critique’. Immanent critique is no longer seen here as part of the critical enquiry into the possible conditions of experience, but as a staging of an encounter with the (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
To Be Done with the Possible, To No Longer Possibilate: Considering the Masochist as the Figure of Exhaustion.Chantelle Gray van Heerden - 2019 - Deleuze and Guattari Studies 13 (2):186-206.details In Coldness and Cruelty, Deleuze remarks that masochism may be reflected on from three perspectives: as a pleasure–pain alliance, as an enactment of humiliation and slavery, and as a consideration of the enslavement of contractual relations. Later Deleuze and Guattari consider masochism in terms of an ontology of desire – in terms of virtuality rather than extensity. I argue that while the actualisation of pain might be considered secondary, and is oftentimes portrayed as incidental in popular depictions, it also constitutes (...) Download Export citation Bookmark

1