Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scientists’ Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.Elizabeth A. Corley, Youngjae Kim & Dietram A. Scheufele - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):111-132.
    Scientists’ sense of social responsibility is particularly relevant for emerging technologies. Since a regulatory vacuum can sometimes occur in the early stages of these technologies, individual scientists’ social responsibility might be one of the most significant checks on the risks and negative consequences of this scientific research. In this article, we analyze data from a 2011 mail survey of leading U.S. nanoscientists to explore their perceptions the regarding social and ethical responsibilities for their nanotechnology research. Our analyses show that leading (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • トランスサイエンス概念をつくりなおす.Ukyo Shimizu - 2021 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 54 (1):85-1.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The academic profession and contemporary politics.Thurstan Shaw - 1989 - Minerva 27 (1):58-86.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Would You Mind, If We Record This? Perceptions on Regulation and Responsibility among Indian Nanoscientists.Subhasis Sahoo - 2013 - NanoEthics 7 (3):231-249.
    Looking at our knowledge of the risks associated with nanotechnology, one wonders to what degree should its products and applications be regulated? Do we need any governing body to regulate nanotechnology research and development? Do individuals have a right to know to make informed decisions through labelling mechanism? The question of regulation and responsibility in the interaction between science, technology and society is one of the most pressing issues. Risks and regulations regarding nanoscience and nanotechnology are mostly debated amongst policy-makers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Consensus, Civility, and Community: The Origins of Minerva and the Vision of Edward Shils.Roy MacLeod - 2016 - Minerva 54 (3):255-292.
    For over 50 years, Minerva has been one of the leading independent journals in the study of ‘science, learning and policy’. Its pages have much to say about the origins and conduct of the ‘intellectual Cold War’, the defence of academic freedom, the emergence of modernization theory, and pioneering strategies in the social studies of science. This paper revisits Minerva through the life and times of its founding Editor, Edward Shils, and traces his influence on its early years – from (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Rise and Demise of the International Council for Science Policy Studies (ICSPS) as a Cold War Bridging Organization.Aant Elzinga - 2012 - Minerva 50 (3):277-305.
    When the journal Minerva was founded in 1962, science and higher educational issues were high on the agenda, lending impetus to the interdisciplinary field of “Science Studies” qua “Science Policy Studies.” As government expenditures for promoting various branches of science increased dramatically on both sides of the East-West Cold War divide, some common issues regarding research management also emerged and with it an interest in closer academic interaction in the areas of history and policy of science. Through a close reading (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations