Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rethinking Responsible Agency in Corporations: Perspectives from Deleuze and Guattari. [REVIEW]Mollie Painter-Morland - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (S1):83-95.
    The notion of “responsibility” can be understood in a number of different ways, namely as being accountable for one’s actions, as a personal trait, or as a task or duty that results from one’s role. In this article we will challenge the assumptions that underpin each of these employments of the word “responsibility” and seek to redefine the concept as such. The main thrust of the argument is that we need to critically interrogate the idea of “identity” and deliberate decision-making (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Making Skin Visible: How Consumer Culture Imagery Commodifies Identity.Jonathan E. Schroeder & Janet L. Borgerson - 2018 - Body and Society 24 (1-2):103-136.
    Human skin, photography, and consumer culture combine to produce striking images designed to promote visions of the good life. Branding and marketing imagery mobilize skin to resonate and communicate with consumers, which influences the meaning-making possibilities of skin more broadly. Representations of skin in consumer culture, including marketing communications, are anything but ‘blank’ backgrounds or ‘neutral’ meaning spaces. We analyse how skin ‘appears’ to work, and how its appearance in consumer culture imagery reveals ideological and pedagogical aspects of skin. Building (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique.Kristen Bell DeTienne, Carol Frogley Ellertson, Marc-Charles Ingerson & William R. Dudley - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 170 (3):429-448.
    The field of behavioral ethics has seen considerable growth over the last few decades. One of the most significant concerns facing this interdisciplinary field of research is the moral judgment-action gap. The moral judgment-action gap is the inconsistency people display when they know what is right but do what they know is wrong. Much of the research in the field of behavioral ethics is based on early work in moral psychology and American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg’s foundational cognitive model of moral (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations