Abstract

The debate on human destiny and its relationship to freedom, responsibility, legality and morality is an ongoing discussion. The concept of destiny especially in Western philosophy depicts a static and unchanging idea that is causal to success or failure in the lives of individuals. Perhaps because of the culture of writing, destiny is seen as represented in black and white ink such that once written, it cannot be erased unlike the culture of oral expressions. Whereas Yoruba account of destiny depicts a possibility of erasing or recanting what is already given prenatally, many scholars have laughed over this or term Yoruba idea as purely metaphorical and inconsistent in expression. The aim of this paper is to argue that the Yoruba idea of destiny is one of the most consistent ideas with the reality before us. It is an all encompassing thesis that bridge the gap between theory and practice and by extension the relationship between ought (morality) and what is (legality). This aim will be achieved by explaining the relationship between the prenatally received destiny and natal active destiny. This is necessary due to our finding that the Western idea of destiny only sees destiny as individualistic without a consideration of collective destiny or social aspect of destiny where different destinies interact and consequently makes social group or government liable for some individual actions. We conclude that Yoruba idea of destiny is consistent with why individuals and societies are responsible for some failures or successes. Our finding embodies the reason why both government and societies can be held responsible for social and personal actions.