Epistemic Landscapes, Optimal Search, and the Division of Cognitive Labor

Philosophy of Science 82 (3):424-453, (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article examines two questions about scientists’ search for knowledge. First, which search strategies generate discoveries effectively? Second, is it advantageous to diversify search strategies? We argue pace Weisberg and Muldoon, “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor”, that, on the first question, a search strategy that deliberately seeks novel research approaches need not be optimal. On the second question, we argue they have not shown epistemic reasons exist for the division of cognitive labor, identifying the errors that led to their conclusions. Furthermore, we generalize the epistemic landscape model, showing that one should be skeptical about the benefits of social learning in epistemically complex environments.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Krause, Jens-Uwe

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dynamics and Diversity in Epistemic Communities.O’Connor, Cailin & Bruner, Justin

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
356 ( #12,136 of 49,104 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #19,992 of 49,104 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.