Epistemic Landscapes, Optimal Search, and the Division of Cognitive Labor

Philosophy of Science 82 (3):424-453, (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article examines two questions about scientists’ search for knowledge. First, which search strategies generate discoveries effectively? Second, is it advantageous to diversify search strategies? We argue pace Weisberg and Muldoon, “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor”, that, on the first question, a search strategy that deliberately seeks novel research approaches need not be optimal. On the second question, we argue they have not shown epistemic reasons exist for the division of cognitive labor, identifying the errors that led to their conclusions. Furthermore, we generalize the epistemic landscape model, showing that one should be skeptical about the benefits of social learning in epistemically complex environments.
Reprint years
2015
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALEELO
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Heesen, Remco & Bright, Liam Kofi
Dynamics and Diversity in Epistemic Communities.O’Connor, Cailin & Bruner, Justin

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-05-29

Total views
305 ( #10,777 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #21,526 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.