Epistemic Landscapes, Optimal Search, and the Division of Cognitive Labor

Philosophy of Science 82 (3):424-453, (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines two questions about scientists’ search for knowledge. First, which search strategies generate discoveries effectively? Second, is it advantageous to diversify search strategies? We argue pace Weisberg and Muldoon, “Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor”, that, on the first question, a search strategy that deliberately seeks novel research approaches need not be optimal. On the second question, we argue they have not shown epistemic reasons exist for the division of cognitive labor, identifying the errors that led to their conclusions. Furthermore, we generalize the epistemic landscape model, showing that one should be skeptical about the benefits of social learning in epistemically complex environments.

Author Profiles

Johannes Himmelreich
Syracuse University
Carmine Thompson
Stanford University
Christopher Jeremy Thompson
University of Tromsø

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-29

Downloads
499 (#16,463)

6 months
44 (#21,623)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?