Inconsistency in Empirical Science

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper deals with a relatively recent trend in the history of analytic philosophy, philosophical logic, and theory of science: the philosophical study of the role of inconsistency in empirical science. This paper is divided in three sections that correspond to the three types of inconsistencies identified: (i) factual, occurring between theory and observations, (ii) external, occurring between two mutually contradictory theories, and (iii) internal, characterising theories that entail mutually contradictory statements.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-06-29
Latest version: 2 (2020-07-17)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #48,559 of 56,907 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #26,783 of 56,907 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.