Animal Rights and the Wrongness of Killing

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay explores the moral reasoning underpinning the common view that it is worse to kill a human compared with killing an animal. After examining the serious deficiencies of traditional approaches, the author develops an alternative utilitarian-based framework that proportions the seriousness of killing to levels of sentience. He demonstrates how this new approach avoids the problems faced by the application of standard utilitarian formulae in weighing the seriousness of killing many low-sentience animals vis-á-vis killing a single human. The author concludes with a discussion of how this new approach overcomes the difficulties faced by Peter Singer’s dualist form of utilitarianism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-03-25
Latest version: 2 (2017-06-16)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
285 ( #24,191 of 65,550 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #26,197 of 65,550 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.