Maxwell's Paradox: The Metaphysics of Classical Electrodynamics and its Time Reversal Invariance

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that the recent discussion on the time - reversal invariance of classical electrodynamics (see (Albert 2000: ch.1), (Arntzenius 2004), (Earman 2002), (Malament 2004),(Horwich 1987: ch.3)) can be best understood assuming that the disagreement among the various authors is actually a disagreement about the metaphysics of classical electrodynamics. If so, the controversy will not be resolved until we have established which alternative is the most natural. It turns out that we have a paradox, namely that the following three claims are incompatible: the electromagnetic fields are real, classical electrodynamics is time-reversal invariant, and the content of the state of affairs of the world does not depend on whether it belongs to a forward or a backward sequence of states of the world.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-03-10
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
254 ( #30,336 of 71,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #14,735 of 71,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.