Strong Neurophilosophy and the Matter of Bat Consciousness: A case study

Erkenntnis 80 (1):57-76 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “What is it like to be boring and myopic?” Kathleen Akins offers an interesting, empirically driven, argument for thinking that there is nothing that it is like to be a bat. She suggests that bats are “boring” in the sense that they are governed by behavioral scripts and simple, non-representational, control loops, and are best characterized as biological automatons. Her approach has been well received by philosophers sympathetic to empirically informed philosophy of mind. But, despite its influence, her work has not met with any critical appraisal. It is argued that a reconsideration of the empirical results shows that bats are not boring automatons, driven by short input-output loops, instincts, and reflexes. Grounds are provided for thinking that bats satisfy a range of philosophically and scientifically interesting elaborations of the general idea that consciousness is best understood in terms of representational functions. A more complete examination of bat sensory capabilities suggests there is something that it is like after all. The discussion of bats is also used to develop an objection to strongly neurophilosophical approaches to animal consciousness.
Categories
Reprint years
2015
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALLSNA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-02-17
Latest version: 2 (2014-02-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-02-17

Total views
676 ( #7,999 of 2,444,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #22,879 of 2,444,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.