Strong Neurophilosophy and the Matter of Bat Consciousness: A case study

Erkenntnis 80 (1):57-76 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In “What is it like to be boring and myopic?” Kathleen Akins offers an interesting, empirically driven, argument for thinking that there is nothing that it is like to be a bat. She suggests that bats are “boring” in the sense that they are governed by behavioral scripts and simple, non-representational, control loops, and are best characterized as biological automatons. Her approach has been well received by philosophers sympathetic to empirically informed philosophy of mind. But, despite its influence, her work has not met with any critical appraisal. It is argued that a reconsideration of the empirical results shows that bats are not boring automatons, driven by short input-output loops, instincts, and reflexes. Grounds are provided for thinking that bats satisfy a range of philosophically and scientifically interesting elaborations of the general idea that consciousness is best understood in terms of representational functions. A more complete examination of bat sensory capabilities suggests there is something that it is like after all. The discussion of bats is also used to develop an objection to strongly neurophilosophical approaches to animal consciousness.
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALLSNA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-02-17
Latest version: 2 (2014-02-23)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-17

Total views
456 ( #5,939 of 40,089 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #8,499 of 40,089 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.