Sobre a possibilidade de pensarmos o mundo: o debate entre John McDowell e Donald Davidson

Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The thesis evaluates a contemporary debate concerning the very possibility of thinking about the world. In the first chapter, McDowell's critique of Davidson is presented, focusing on the coherentism defended by the latter. The critique of the myth of the given (as it appears in Sellars and Wittgenstein), as well as the necessity of a minimal empiricism (which McDowell finds in Quine and Kant), lead to an oscillation in contemporary thinking between two equally unsatisfactory ways of understanding the empirical content of thought. In the second chapter, I defend Davidson's approach, focusing on his theory of interpretation and semantic externalism, as well as on the relation between causes and reasons. In the third chapter, the debate is analyzed in more detail. I criticize the anomalous monism, the way in which the boundaries between the conceptual and the non-conceptual are understood by Davidson, as well as the naturalized Platonism defended by McDowell. This thesis is mainly negative, and it concludes by revealing problems in both positions under evaluation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ALVSAP
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-10-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mental Events.Davidson, Donald
Mind and World.Price, Huw & McDowell, John
The Varieties of Reference.Antony, Louise M.; Evans, Gareth & McDowell, John

View all 107 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-29

Total views
363 ( #8,227 of 40,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
100 ( #4,528 of 40,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.