Imaginative Vividness

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
How are we to understand the phenomenology of imagining? Attempts to answer this question often invoke descriptors concerning the “vivacity” or “vividness” of our imaginative states. Not only are particular imaginings often phenomenologically compared and contrasted with other imaginings on grounds of how vivid they are, but such imaginings are also often compared and contrasted with perceptions and memories on similar grounds. Yet however natural it may be to use “vividness” and cognate terms in discussions of imagination, it does not take much reflection to see that these terms are ill understood. In this paper, I review both some relevant empirical literature as well as the philosophical literature attempt to get a handle on what it could mean, in an imaginative context, to talk of vividness. As I suggest, this notion ultimately proves to be so problematic as to be philosophically untenable.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
AMYIV
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
A Treatise of Human Nature.Hume, David & Lindsay, A. D.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-12

Total views
324 ( #13,421 of 48,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
68 ( #9,043 of 48,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.