Beliefs do not come in degrees

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):760-778 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Philosophers commonly say that beliefs come in degrees. Drawing from the literature, I make precise three arguments for this claim: an argument from degrees of confidence, an argument from degrees of firmness, and an argument from natural language. I show that they all fail. I also advance three arguments that beliefs do not come in degrees: an argument from natural language, an argument from intuition, and an argument from the metaphysics of degrees. On the basis of these arguments, I conclude that beliefs do not come in degrees.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANDBDN
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-04-12
Latest version: 5 (2017-05-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
Belief, Credence, and Norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-04-11

Total views
1,849 ( #568 of 38,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
349 ( #796 of 38,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.