Critter psychology: On the possibility of nonhuman animal folk psychology

In Daniel D. Hutto & Matthew Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed. Kluwer/Springer Press. pp. 191--209 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
When we ask the question whether animals have their own folk psychology, we’re asking whether any other species has a commonsense conception of psychological phenomenon. Different versions of this question have been discussed over the past 25 years, but no clear answer has emerged. Perhaps one reason for this lack of progress is that we don’t clearly understand the question. I defend a two-fold view of folk psychology that takes as central the capacity to engage in some folk psychological practices (e.g. predicting, explaining, coordinating, justifying, etc.) and the capacity to see another as minded. Given this account, I argue that chimpanzees, as intentional agents who engage in folk psychological practices and have some understanding of others as minded agents, are folk psychologists.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, G.
Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?Premack, David & Woodruff, Guy
Rational Animals.Davidson, Donald

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
187 ( #21,181 of 47,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #37,836 of 47,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.