Gender Identity and Exclusion: A Reply to Jenkins

Ethics 127 (4):883-895 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A theory of gender ought to be compatible with trans-inclusive definitions of gender identity terms, such as ‘woman’ and ‘man’. Appealing to this principle of trans-inclusion, Katharine Jenkins argues that we ought to endorse a dual social position and identity theory of gender. Here, I argue that Jenkins’s dual theory of gender fails to be trans-inclusive for the following reasons: it cannot generate a definition of ‘woman’ that extends to include all trans women, and it understands transgender gender identity through a cisgender frame.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-03-16
Latest version: 7 (2018-05-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
934 ( #2,750 of 45,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
386 ( #872 of 45,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.