Thinking about Deliberative Democracy with Rawls and Talisse

Concordia Law Review 5 (1):134-161 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this article, I identify some good-making features of a deliberative democratic theory. The article will proceed as follows: First, I present both some important insights and some shortcomings of Rawls’ theory. I then present Robert Talisse’s account, focusing on how Talisse both accommodates what is right about Rawls while avoiding some of Rawls’ weaknesses. Finally, some positive claims are made about what an adequate deliberative theory might look like.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-07-28
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #42,838 of 55,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,105 of 55,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.