Le Labyrinthe temporel. Simplicité, persistance et création continuée chez Leibniz

Archives de Philosophie 77 (1):43-62 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
How to reconcile monadic simplicity with the successive plurality of the monadic states ? The doctrine of continued creation seems to entail the existence of independent temporal parts and thus lead to the thesis that the world contains only transitory things. I try to show how Leibniz has the resources to get out of this quandary. The analysis of the concept of extension shows that a plurality of states does not constitute a divisible aggregate. Then I examine the Leibnizian interpretation of continued creation, by com- paring it to the scholastic and Cartesian Background. From thence I conclude that Leibniz’s final thesis is that monads are wholly present at each moment of their duration.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-31
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
262 ( #10,671 of 38,900 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #22,793 of 38,900 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.