Necessidade, Teleologia e Hilemorfismo em Aristóteles

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that Aristotle’s teleology in natural science (more specifically, in biology) is not incompatible with his admissions of the “brute necessity” of the movements of matter. Aristotle thinks that the brute necessity emerging from the movements of matter is not sufficient to explain why living beings are what they are and behave the way they behave. Nevertheless, Aristotle takes this brute necessity to be a sine qua non condition in biological explanations. The full explanation of the features of living beings requires the hylomorphic model, in which the brute necessity belonging to the matter is subordinated to the teleological causality of the form. The model for which I argue is pretty much Balme’s “cybernetic”. However, I explore some aspects of Aristotle’s texts that have not received much attention in the recent literature.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
380 ( #8,363 of 42,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #6,496 of 42,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.