The Egalitarian Fallacy: Are Group Differences Compatible with Political Liberalism?

Philosophia:1-12 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many people greet evidence of biologically based race and sex differences with extreme skepticism, even hostility. We argue that some of the vehemence with which many intellectuals in the West resist claims about group differences is rooted in the tacit assumption that accepting evidence for group differences in socially valued traits would undermine our reasons to treat people with respect. We call this the egalitarian fallacy. We first explain the fallacy and then give evidence that self-described liberals in the United States are especially likely to commit it when they reason about topics like race and sex. We then argue that people should not be as worried as they often are about research that finds psychological differences between men and women, or between people of different racial or ethnic groups. We conclude that if moral equality is believed to rest on biological identity, ethnically diverse societies are in trouble.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ANOTEF
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Race Research and the Ethics of Belief.Jonny Anomaly - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):287-297.
Practical Ethics.Fischer, John Martin & Singer, Peter

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-06

Total views
53 ( #35,227 of 43,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #13,478 of 43,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.