Epistemological reflections about the crisis of the DSM-5 and the revolutionary potential of the RDoC project

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper tests the predictions of an epistemological model that considered the DSM psychiatric classification (in the neopositivist and neo-Kraepelinian shape introduced by the DSM-III) as a scientific paradigm in crisis. As predicted, the DSM-5 did not include revolutionary proposals in its basic structure. In particular, the possibility of a dimensional revolution has not occurred and early proposals of etiopathogenic diagnoses were not implemented due to lack of specific knowledge in that field. However, conceiving the DSM-5 as a bridge between the present phenomenally based operational diagnostic criteria and the neuro-cognitively based RDoC criteria introduces an internal tension into the system. It is expected that a liberalization of the research criteria will occur, the DSM operational criteria being only one possible way to select research subjects.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARAERA
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-04-18
Latest version: 1 (2016-01-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-18

Total views
281 ( #12,905 of 43,981 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #17,132 of 43,981 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.