Dutch Books, Additivity, and Utility Theory

Philosophical Topics 21 (1):1-20 (1993)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One guide to an argument's significance is the number and variety of refutations it attracts. By this measure, the Dutch book argument has considerable importance.2 Of course this measure alone is not a sure guide to locating arguments deserving of our attention—if a decisive refutation has really been given, we are better off pursuing other topics. But the presence of many and varied counterarguments at least suggests that either the refutations are controversial, or that their target admits of more than one interpretation, or both. The main point of this paper is to focus on a way of understanding the Dutch Book argument (DBA) that avoids many of the well-known criticisms, and to consider how it fares against an important criticism that still remains: the objection that the DBA presupposes value-independence of bets.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARMDBA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Probability and Partial Belief.Ramsey, Frank Plumpton

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Are Degrees of Belief.Eriksson, Lina & Hájek, Alan

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
260 ( #14,214 of 44,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #30,459 of 44,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.