Metanormative Principles and Norm Governed Social Interaction

Revus 22:105-120 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Critical examination of Alchourrón and Bulygin’s set-theoretic definition of normative system shows that deductive closure is not an inevitable property. Following von Wright’s conjecture that axioms of standard deontic logic describe perfection-properties of a norm-set, a translation algorithm from the modal to the set-theoretic language is introduced. The translations reveal that the plausibility of metanormative principles rests on different grounds. Using a methodological approach that distinguishes the actor roles in a norm governed interaction, it has been shown that metanormative principles are directed second-order obligations and, in particular, that the requirement related to deductive closure is directed to the norm-applier role rather than to the norm-giver role. The approach has been applied to the case of pure derogation yielding a new result, namely, that an independence property is a perfection-property of a norm-set in view of possible derogation. This paper in a polemical way touches upon several points raised by Kristan in his recent paper
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-05-06
Latest version: 2 (2014-09-11)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
154 ( #35,860 of 2,448,880 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,254 of 2,448,880 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.