Negotiation as an intersubjective process: Creating and validating claim-rights

Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):89-108 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Negotiation is mainly treated as a process through which counterparts try to satisfy their conflicting interests. This traditional, subjective approach focuses on the interests-based relation between subjects and the resources which are on the bargaining table; negotiation is viewed as a series of joint decisions regarding the relation of each subject to the negotiated resources. In this paper, we will attempt to outline an intersubjective perspective that focuses on the communication-based relation among subjects, a relation that is founded upon communicative rationality mechanisms which are inherent in social activity. Much in contrast to the concept of interests which describe the relationship of each subject alone to the resources, we will use the concept of ?claim-rights? which are properly formed and validated only vis-à-vis negotiating partners and on the basis of the communication that develops among them. We will offer a step-by-step account of the creation of claim-rights and argue that their validation does not necessarily lie in the parties? interests, but in the communication mechanisms that induce consensus and result in mutually acceptable outcomes
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ARVNAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-12-10

Total views
162 ( #34,782 of 63,339 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #53,254 of 63,339 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.