The Duty to Promote Digital Minimalism in Group Agents

In Kantian Ethics and the Attention Economy: Duty and Distraction. Palgrave Macmillan (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, we turn our attention to the effects of the attention economy on our ability to act autonomously as a group. We begin by clarifying which sorts of groups we are concerned with, which are structured groups (groups sufficiently organized that it makes sense to attribute agency to the group itself). Drawing on recent work by Purves and Davis (2022), we describe the essential roles of trust (i.e., depending on groups to fulfill their commitments) and trustworthiness (i.e., the property of a group that makes trusting them fitting) in autonomous group action, with particular emphasis on democratic institutions (which we view as group agents) and democratic legitimacy (which depends on trust and trustworthiness). We then explain how engagement maximization promotes polarization, which is detrimental to trust and trustworthiness and, in turn, democratic legitimacy and democratic institutions. We close by considering what groups might do to protect themselves from the threat posed to them by the attention economy.

Author Profiles

Tim Aylsworth
Florida International University
Clinton Castro
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-14

Downloads
247 (#60,975)

6 months
247 (#9,273)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?