Nietzsche and Eros between the devil and God's deep blue sea: The problem of the artist as actor-jew-woman

Continental Philosophy Review 33 (2):159-188 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a single aphorism in The Gay Science, Nietzsche arrays “The Problem of the Artist” in a reticulated constellation. Addressing every member of the excluded grouping of disenfranchised “others,” Nietzsche turns to the destitution of a god of love keyed to the selfturning absorption of the human heart. His ultimate and irrecusably tragic project to restore the innocence of becoming requires the affirmation of the problem of suffering as the task of learning how to love. Nietzsche sees the eros of art as what can teach us how to make things beautiful, desirable, lovable in the routine truth of reality: “When they are not.” The stumbling block for those of us paralyzed by impotence and frozen in a technological age of anxiety, longing for being not becoming (eternal youth), is that one can never possess but can only win great health, again and again (like erotic desire), because one gives it away again and again as sacrifice or affirmation without reserve: that is to say, with erotic artistry
Reprint years
2004
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BABNAE-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
144 ( #29,415 of 53,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #38,064 of 53,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.