Socrates, Thrasymachus, and Competition among the Unjust: Republic 1.349b–350c

Ancient Philosophy Today 2 (1):1-23 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Republic 1, Thrasymachus makes the radical claim that being just is ‘high-minded simplicity’ and being unjust is ‘good judgment’. Because injustice involves benefiting oneself, while justice involves benefiting others, the unjust are wise and good and the just are foolish and bad. The “greedy craftsperson” argument attempts to show that the unjust person's desire to outdo or have more than everyone is a symptom of her ignorance. Many commentaries have found the argument problematic and unclear. However, this paper argues that the greedy craftsperson argument defends plausible constraints on the nature of justice and wisdom.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAISTA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-05-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-26

Total views
17 ( #50,724 of 51,728 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #30,889 of 51,728 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.