Why Take Painkillers?

Noûs 2017 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Accounts of the nature of unpleasant pain have proliferated over the past decade, but there has been little systematic investigation of which of them can accommodate its badness. This paper is such a study. In its sights are two targets: those who deny the non-instrumental disvalue of pain's unpleasantness; and those who allow it but deny that it can be accommodated by the view—advanced by me and others—that unpleasant pains are interoceptive experiences with evaluative content. Against the former, I argue that pain's unpleasantness does indeed have noninstrumental disvalue; against the latter I argue both that my critics’ own desire-theoretic accounts of pain's unpleasantness cannot accommodate such disvalue, and that my evaluativist view can—either by appealing to “anti-unpleasantness” desires or by exploiting pain's perceptuality.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAIWTP
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-10-27
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-27)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Silence of the Senses.Travis, Charles S.
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Recent Work on Pain.Corns, Jennifer

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-19

Total downloads
143 ( #16,178 of 35,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #7,819 of 35,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.