Religious Dogma without Religious Fundamentalism

Journal of Social Science 8 (1):85-90 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
New Atheists and Anti-Theists (such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hutchins) affirm that there is a strong connection between being a traditional theist and being a religious fundamentalist who advocates violence, terrorism, and war. They are especially critical of Islam. On the contrary, I argue that, when correctly understood, religious dogmatic belief, present in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, is progressive and open to internal and external criticism and revision. Moreover, acknowledging that human knowledge is finite and that humans are fallible and have much to learn, dogmatic religious believers accept that they ought to value and seek to acquire moral and intellectual virtues, including the virtues of temperance and reasonability.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BALRDW
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-05-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-05-29

Total views
436 ( #6,037 of 39,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #11,784 of 39,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.