Singuläre Propositionen und das Fassen eines Gedankens

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This essay develops the thesis that Frege’s notion of grasping does not refer to some special psychological relation between a subject and a proposition. Instead, the verb “to grasp” is a contextually defined technical term that, taken by itself, has no meaning. If that is right, then not only Frege’s resentment to the idea of grasping singular propositions is unfounded. The view that intentionality without representations is possible, championed by some advocates of the New Theory of Reference, is groundless as well.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #35,400 of 40,131 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #30,698 of 40,131 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.