Knowledge, Practical Reasoning and Action

Logos and Episteme 3 (1):7-26 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is knowledge necessary or sufficient or both necessary and sufficient for acceptable practical reasoning and rational action? Several authors (e.g., Williamson, Hawthorne, and Stanley) have recently argued that the answer to these questions is positive. In this paper I present several objections against this view (both in its basic form as well in more developed forms). I also offer a sketch of an alternative view: What matters for the acceptability of practical reasoning in at least many cases (and in all the cases discussed by the defenders of a strong link between knowledge and practical reasoning) is not so much knowledge but expected utility.
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAUKPR
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-09-15

Total downloads
134 ( #17,685 of 37,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #11,912 of 37,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.