True Knowledge

Logos and Episteme (4):463-467 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
That knowledge is factive, that is, that knowledge that p requires that p, has for a long time typically been treated as a truism. Recently, however, some authors have raised doubts about and arguments against this claim. In a recent paper in this journal, Michael Shaffer presents new arguments against the denial of the factivity of knowledge. This article discusses one of Shaffer’s objections: the one from “inconsistency and explosion”. I discuss two potential replies to Shaffer’s problem: dialetheism plus paraconsistency and epistemic pluralism. This is not to be understood so much as a criticism of Shaffer’s view but rather as a request to develop his very promising objection from inconsistency and explosion further.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BAUTK
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-01-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-01-10

Total views
17 ( #65,297 of 65,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #40,725 of 65,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.