Was Hegel an Authoritarian Thinker? Reading Hegel's Philosophy of History on the Basis of his Metaphysics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
With Hegel’s metaphysics attracting renewed attention, it is time to address a longstanding criticism: Scholars from Marx to Popper and Habermas have worried that Hegel’s metaphysics has anti-individualist and authoritarian implications, which are particularly pronounced in his Philosophy of History, since Hegel identifies historical progress with reason imposing itself on individuals. Rather than proposing an alternative non-metaphysical conception of reason, as Pippin or Brandom have done, this article argues that critics are broadly right in their metaphysical reading of Hegel’s central concepts. However, they are mistaken about what Hegel’s approach entails, when one examines the specific types of states discussed (and rejected) by the philosopher in his Philosophy of History. Even on a traditional metaphysical reading, Hegel is not only nonauthoritarian; he also makes a powerful argument concerning freedom, whereupon the freest society involves collective oversight and the shaping of social structures so as to ensure that they benefit everybody.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-05-02
Latest version: 3 (2020-11-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
171 ( #28,216 of 55,913 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #15,931 of 55,913 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.