Reconsidering a transplant: A response to Wagner

South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):132-140 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Nils-Frederic Wagner takes issue with my argument that influential critics of “transplant” thought experiments make two cardinal mistakes. He responds that the mistakes I identify are not mistakes at all. The mistakes are rather on my part, in that I have not taken into account the conceptual genesis of personhood, that my view of thought experiments is idiosyncratic and possibly self-defeating, and in that I have ignored important empirical evidence about the relationship between brains and minds. I argue that my case still stands and that transplant thought experiments can do damage to rivals of a psychological continuity theory of personal identity like Marya Schechtman’s Person Life View.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BECRAT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-10-14

Total views
116 ( #31,470 of 51,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #29,795 of 51,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.