Reconsidering a transplant: A response to Wagner

South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):132-140 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Nils-Frederic Wagner takes issue with my argument that influential critics of “transplant” thought experiments make two cardinal mistakes. He responds that the mistakes I identify are not mistakes at all. The mistakes are rather on my part, in that I have not taken into account the conceptual genesis of personhood, that my view of thought experiments is idiosyncratic and possibly self-defeating, and in that I have ignored important empirical evidence about the relationship between brains and minds. I argue that my case still stands and that transplant thought experiments can do damage to rivals of a psychological continuity theory of personal identity like Marya Schechtman’s Person Life View.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-06
View other versions
Added to PP

216 (#35,233)

6 months
24 (#35,474)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?