Objectivity and Bias

Mind 126 (503):655-695 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The twin goals of this essay are: to investigate a family of cases in which the goal of guaranteed convergence to the truth is beyond our reach; and to argue that each of three strands prominent in contemporary epistemological thought has undesirable consequences when confronted with the existence of such problems. Approaches that follow Reichenbach in taking guaranteed convergence to the truth to be the characteristic virtue of good methods face a vicious closure problem. Approaches on which there is a unique rational doxastic response to any given body of evidence can avoid incoherence only by rendering epistemology a curiously limited enterprise. Bayesian approaches rule out humility about one’s prospects of success in certain situations in which failure is typical.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BELOAB
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-08-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-08-02

Total views
430 ( #11,001 of 53,671 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #12,097 of 53,671 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.