Dubious objections from iterated conjunctions

Philosophical Studies 162 (2):355-358 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The knowledge account of assertion - roughly: one should not assert what one does not know - can explain a variety of Moorean conjunctions, a fact often cited as evidence in its favor. David Sosa ("Dubious Assertions," Phil Studies, 2009) has objected that the account does not generalize satisfactorily, since it cannot explain the infelicity of certain iterated conjunctions without appealing to the controversial "KK" principle. This essay responds by showing how the knowledge account can handle such conjunctions without use of the KK principle.

Author's Profile

Matthew A. Benton
Seattle Pacific University

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-30

Downloads
734 (#10,007)

6 months
44 (#22,760)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?