Experiments in Distributive Justice and Their Limits

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Mark Pennington argues political systems should be decentralized in order to facilitate experimental learning about distributive justice. Pointing out the problems with Pennington's Hayekian formulation, I reframe his argument as an extension of the Millian idea of 'experiments in living.' However, the experimental case for decentralization is limited in several ways. Even if decentralization improves our knowledge about justice, it impedes the actual implementation of all conceptions of justice other than libertarianism. I conclude by arguing for the compatibility of egalitarian redistribution with the epistemic virtues of markets pointed out by Hayek.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BENEID-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-02-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-02-20

Total views
383 ( #17,436 of 64,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
78 ( #8,507 of 64,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.