Gricean Quality

Noûs 50 (4):689-703 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Some philosophers oppose recent arguments for the Knowledge Norm of Assertion by claiming that assertion, being an act much like any other, will be subject to norms governing acts generally, such as those articulated by Grice for the purpose of successful, cooperative endeavours. But in fact, Grice is a traitor to their cause; or rather, they are his dissenters, not his disciples. Drawing on Grice's unpublished papers, I show that he thought of asserting as a special linguistic act in need of its own norm, and he tied his maxim of Quality to knowledge. I also develop a simple Gricean-inspired argument showing that the Quality maxim is not dependent on the Cooperative Principle. If it is not thus dependent, then the Cooperative Principle cannot be the explanation of, or source of normativity for, the Quality maxim. Thus, leveraging the insights informing the maxim of Quality actually provides the resources for a distinctive positive case that knowledge is the constitutive norm of assertion.
Reprint years
2014, 2016, 2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-03-30
Latest version: 3 (2016-11-13)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Knowledge First?McGlynn, Aidan
Speech Acts: The Contemporary Theoretical Landscape.Harris, Daniel W.; Fogal, Daniel & Moss, Matt

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
566 ( #6,706 of 49,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #22,584 of 49,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.