Knowledge, Hope, and Fallibilism

Synthese:1-17 (2018, early view)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Hope, in its propositional construction "I hope that p," is compatible with a stated chance for the speaker that not-p. On fallibilist construals of knowledge, knowledge is compatible with a chance of being wrong, such that one can know that p even though there is an epistemic chance for one that not-p. But self-ascriptions of propositional hope that p seem to be incompatible, in some sense, with self-ascriptions of knowing whether p. Data from conjoining hope self-ascription with outright assertions, with first- and third-person knowledge ascriptions, and with factive predicates suggest a problem: when combined with a plausible principle on the rationality of hope, they suggest that fallibilism is false. By contrast, the infallibilist about knowledge can straightforwardly explain why knowledge would be incompatible with hope, and can offer a simple and unified explanation of all the linguistic data introduced here. This suggests that fallibilists bear an explanatory burden which has been hitherto overlooked.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BENKHA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-04-09
Latest version: 2 (2018-04-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew
Epistemic Modals.Yalcin, Seth
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer

View all 50 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Hedged Assertion.Benton, Matthew A. & Van Elswyk, Peter

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-09

Total views
438 ( #8,477 of 46,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
127 ( #4,248 of 46,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.