Questionable Peers and Spinelessness

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):425-444 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Equal Weight View holds that, when we discover we disagree with an epistemic peer, we should give our peer’s judgment as much weight as our own. But how should we respond when we cannot tell whether those who disagree with us are our epistemic peers? I argue for a position I will call the Earn-a-Spine View. According to this view, parties to a disagreement can remain confdent, at least in some situations, by fnding justifable reasons to think their opponents are less credible than themselves, even if those reasons are justifable only because they lack information about their opponents.

Author's Profile

Benjamin Sherman
Boston University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
234 (#65,005)

6 months
51 (#81,322)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?