The modal gap: The objective problem of Lessing's ditch(es) and Kierkegaard's subjective reply

Religious Studies 42 (1):27-44 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay expands upon the suggestion that Lessing's infamous ‘ditch’ is actually three ditches: temporal, metaphysical, and existential gaps. It examines the complex problems these ditches raise, and then proposes that Kierkegaard's Fragments and Postscript exhibit a similar triadic organizational structure, which may signal a deliberate attempt to engage and respond to Lessing's three gaps. Viewing the Climacean project in this way offers an enhanced understanding of the intricacies of Lessing's rationalist approach to both religion and historical truth, and illuminates Climacus's subjective response to Lessing.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BENTMG
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-04-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
314 ( #9,801 of 40,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #5,059 of 40,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.