A Modality Called ‘Negation’

Mind 124 (495):761-793 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I propose a comprehensive account of negation as a modal operator, vindicating a moderate logical pluralism. Negation is taken as a quantifier on worlds, restricted by an accessibility relation encoding the basic concept of compatibility. This latter captures the core meaning of the operator. While some candidate negations are then ruled out as violating plausible constraints on compatibility, different specifications of the notion of world support different logical conducts for negations. The approach unifies in a philosophically motivated picture the following results: nothing can be called a negation properly if it does not satisfy Contraposition and Double Negation Introduction; the pair consisting of two split or Galois negations encodes a distinction without a difference; some paraconsistent negations also fail to count as real negations, but others may; intuitionistic negation qualifies as real negation, and classical Boolean negation does as well, to the extent that constructivist and paraconsistent doubts on it do not turn on the basic concept of compatibility but rather on the interpretation of worlds
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-07-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Logical Pluralism.Beall, Jc & Restall, Greg

View all 71 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Negation on the Australian Plan.Berto, Franz & Restall, Greg

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
393 ( #7,418 of 40,618 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #9,003 of 40,618 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.