(Probably) Not companions in guilt

Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2285-2308 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I will attempt to develop and defend a common form of intuitive resistance to the companions in guilt argument. I will argue that one can reasonably believe there are promising solutions to the access problem for mathematical realism that don’t translate to moral realism. In particular, I will suggest that the structuralist project of accounting for mathematical knowledge in terms of some form of logical knowledge offers significant hope of success while no analogous approach offers such hope for moral realism.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BERNCI-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-10-17
Latest version: 2 (2020-06-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-08-15

Total views
140 ( #35,314 of 2,432,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #36,450 of 2,432,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.