(Probably) Not companions in guilt

Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2285-2308 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I will attempt to develop and defend a common form of intuitive resistance to the companions in guilt argument. I will argue that one can reasonably believe there are promising solutions to the access problem for mathematical realism that don’t translate to moral realism. In particular, I will suggest that the structuralist project of accounting for mathematical knowledge in terms of some form of logical knowledge offers significant hope of success while no analogous approach offers such hope for moral realism.

Author's Profile

Sharon Berry
Indiana University, Bloomington

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-15

Downloads
284 (#31,577)

6 months
71 (#16,046)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?