Overdetermination Underdetermined

Erkenntnis 81 (1):17-40 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Widespread causal overdetermination is often levied as an objection to nonreductive theories of minds and objects. In response, nonreductive metaphysicians have argued that the type of overdetermination generated by their theories is different from the sorts of coincidental cases involving multiple rock-throwers, and thus not problematic. This paper pushes back. I argue that attention to differences between types of overdetermination discharges very few explanatory burdens, and that overdetermination is a bigger problem for the nonreductive metaphysician than previously thought
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-02-03
Latest version: 2 (2015-02-08)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
949 ( #4,310 of 58,284 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
181 ( #2,687 of 58,284 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.