Reconsidering Scenic Beauty

Environmental Values 19 (3):335 - 350 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Attempts to justify the objectivity and universality of aesthetic judgment have traditionally rested on unsupported assumptions or mere assertion. This paper offers a fresh consideration of the problem of judgments of taste. It suggests that the problem of securing universal agreement is false and therefore insoluble since it imposes an inappropriate logical criterion on the extent of agreement, which is irrevocably empirical. The variability of judgments of taste actually forms a subject ripe for inquiry by sociologists, psychologists, historians and anthropologists, as well as by aestheticians. Scenic beauty provides a vivid test for the variability of these judgments
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BERRSB
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Philosophical investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig & Anscombe, G. E. M.
A Philosophy of Gardens.Cooper, David E.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-29

Total views
173 ( #22,577 of 47,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #12,595 of 47,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.