The Paradox of Counterfactual Tolerance

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Counterfactuals are somewhat tolerant. Had Socrates been at least six feet tall, he need not have been exactly six feet tall. He might have been a little taller—he might have been six one or six two. But while he might have been a little taller, there are limits to how tall he would have been. Had he been at least six feet tall, he would not have been more than a hundred feet tall, for example. Counterfactuals are not just tolerant, then, but bounded. This paper presents a surprising paradox: If counterfactuals are tolerant and bounded, then we can prove a flat contradiction using natural rules of inference. Something has to go then. But what?
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-09-19
Latest version: 9 (2021-12-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #50,264 of 65,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
84 ( #8,360 of 65,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.