The world is either digital or analogue

Synthese 191 (3):481-497 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We address an argument by Floridi (Synthese 168(1):151–178, 2009; 2011a), to the effect that digital and analogue are not features of reality, only of modes of presentation of reality. One can therefore have an informational ontology, like Floridi’s Informational Structural Realism, without commitment to a supposedly digital or analogue world. After introducing the topic in Sect. 1, in Sect. 2 we explain what the proposition expressed by the title of our paper means. In Sect. 3, we describe Floridi’s argument. In the following three sections, we raise three difficulties for it, (i) an objection from intuitions: Floridi’s view is not supported by the intuitions embedded in the scientific views he exploits (Sect. 4); (ii) an objection from mereology: the view is incompatible with the world’s having parts (Sect. 5); (iii) an objection from counting: the view entails that the question of how many things there are doesn’t make sense (Sect. 6). In Sect. 7, we outline two possible ways out for Floridi’s position. Such ways out involve tampering with the logical properties of identity, and this may be bothersome enough. Thus, Floridi’s modus ponens will be our (and most ontologists’) modus tollens
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-01-12
Latest version: 2 (2015-04-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
508 ( #7,737 of 49,018 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #18,329 of 49,018 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.