Is Power Noumenal in Nature?

Dialogue (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper engages Rainer Forst’s doctrine of noumenal power. At the centre of this doctrine is its signature claim that power is noumenal in nature. I reconstruct Forst’s definition of power and distinguish three conceptions of noumenal power in his writings. I argue that, on each conception, we should reject that claim. It emerges that the professed noumenality of power is either a trivial feature of power, or else a feature only of some forms of power. Consequently, Forst’s definition of power cannot be adequate and the claim that power is noumenal in nature is either trivial or false.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BESIPN
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-11-26
Latest version: 5 (2020-12-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-11-26

Total views
57 ( #56,042 of 65,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #45,887 of 65,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.